Guitar Story
Guitar Story
Through the 1910s, The Harmony Company (Wilhelm Schultz), Chicago and Sears, Roebuck and Co. controlled the Harmony name, and 1 plant built it: Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified).[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
2 eras touch the 1910s across 1 line. The version changed in 1916. A guitar from either side of those years can be a different Harmony.
| Year | Controlled by | Built at | Changed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910 | The Harmony Company (Wilhelm Schultz), Chicago | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[1, 2] | |
| 1911 | The Harmony Company (Wilhelm Schultz), Chicago | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[1, 2] | |
| 1912 | The Harmony Company (Wilhelm Schultz), Chicago | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[1, 2] | |
| 1913 | The Harmony Company (Wilhelm Schultz), Chicago | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[1, 2] | |
| 1914 | The Harmony Company (Wilhelm Schultz), Chicago | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[1, 2] | |
| 1915 | The Harmony Company (Wilhelm Schultz), Chicago | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[1, 2] | |
| 1916 | Sears, Roebuck and Co. | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[3, 4, 5, 2] | yes |
| 1917 | Sears, Roebuck and Co. | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[3, 4, 5, 2] | |
| 1918 | Sears, Roebuck and Co. | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[3, 4, 5, 2] | |
| 1919 | Sears, Roebuck and Co. | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified)[3, 4, 5, 2] |
| Line | Years | Controlled by | Built at | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harmony Chicago | 1892–1916 | The Harmony Company (Wilhelm Schultz), Chicago | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified) | community[1, 2] |
| Harmony Chicago | 1916–1940 | Sears, Roebuck and Co. | Harmony Chicago factory (address unverified) | community[3, 4, 5, 2] |
Every numbered marker on this page points here: the document, its grade and the passages relied on. An era is computed, so it cites the facts it was derived from. A fact marked “no source” has no claim attached yet.
See something wrong, or know a better source?