Guitar Story
Guitar Story
Through the 1960s, Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) and Norlin Corporation (ECL) controlled the Epiphone name, and 1 plant built it: Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone).[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
2 eras touch the 1960s across 1 line. The version changed in 1969. A guitar from either side of those years can be a different Epiphone.
| Year | Controlled by | Built at | Changed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1961 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1962 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1963 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1964 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1965 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1966 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1967 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1968 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | |
| 1969 | Norlin Corporation (ECL) | No plant on record[8, 3, 9] | yes |
| Line | Years | Controlled by | Built at | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epiphone Kalamazoo | 1957–1969 | Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (CMI) | Kalamazoo Parsons St / Eleanor St (Epiphone) | community[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] |
| Epiphone Kalamazoo | 1969–1970 | Norlin Corporation (ECL) | No plant on record | community[8, 3, 9] |
Every numbered marker on this page points here: the document, its grade and the passages relied on. An era is computed, so it cites the facts it was derived from. A fact marked “no source” has no claim attached yet.
See something wrong, or know a better source?