Guitar Story
Guitar Story
Through the 1960s, C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) controlled the Martin name, and 2 plants built it: Martin North Street plant (NRHP) and Martin 510 Sycamore Street.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
2 eras touch the 1960s across 1 line. The version changed in 1964. A guitar from either side of those years can be a different Martin.
| Year | Controlled by | Built at | Changed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin North Street plant (NRHP)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] | |
| 1961 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin North Street plant (NRHP)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] | |
| 1962 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin North Street plant (NRHP)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] | |
| 1963 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin North Street plant (NRHP)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] | |
| 1964 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin 510 Sycamore Street[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8] | yes |
| 1965 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin 510 Sycamore Street[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8] | |
| 1966 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin 510 Sycamore Street[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8] | |
| 1967 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin 510 Sycamore Street[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8] | |
| 1968 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin 510 Sycamore Street[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8] | |
| 1969 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin 510 Sycamore Street[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8] |
| Line | Years | Controlled by | Built at | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin USA (Nazareth) | 1859–1964 | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin North Street plant (NRHP) | community[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
| Martin USA (Nazareth) | 1964–now | C.F. Martin & Co., Inc. (Martin family) | Martin 510 Sycamore Street | community[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8] |
Every numbered marker on this page points here: the document, its grade and the passages relied on. An era is computed, so it cites the facts it was derived from. A fact marked “no source” has no claim attached yet.
See something wrong, or know a better source?