Guitar Story
Guitar Story
Through the 1960s, Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. controlled the Ibanez name, and 3 plants built it: FujiGen, Tama Seisakusho (Ibanez; city unverified) and Teisco (Ibanez; city unverified).[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
3 eras touch the 1960s across 2 lines. The version changed in 1966 and 1969. A guitar from either side of those years can be a different Ibanez.
| Year | Controlled by | Built at | Changed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Tama Seisakusho (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | |
| 1961 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Tama Seisakusho (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | |
| 1962 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Tama Seisakusho (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | |
| 1963 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Tama Seisakusho (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | |
| 1964 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Tama Seisakusho (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | |
| 1965 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Tama Seisakusho (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | |
| 1966 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Teisco (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | yes |
| 1967 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Teisco (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | |
| 1968 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Teisco (Ibanez; city unverified)[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | |
| 1969 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Teisco (Ibanez; city unverified), FujiGen[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] | yes |
| Line | Years | Controlled by | Built at | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ibanez Japan (FujiGen: J Custom, Prestige) | 1969–1981 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | FujiGen | community[1, 2, 3, 4] |
| Ibanez Japan early (Tama, Teisco) | 1935–1966 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Tama Seisakusho (Ibanez; city unverified) | community[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] |
| Ibanez Japan early (Tama, Teisco) | 1966–1970 | Hoshino Gakki Ten, Inc. | Teisco (Ibanez; city unverified) | community[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] |
Every numbered marker on this page points here: the document, its grade and the passages relied on. An era is computed, so it cites the facts it was derived from. A fact marked “no source” has no claim attached yet.
See something wrong, or know a better source?